disclaimer: as my roommates and i do not pay for or have access to cable television, or any television for that matter, i was not able to watch the grammys. everything i know of last night's award show is hearsay from the internet.
let's start with the positive. or the dark cloud with a silver lining. quite a back story here. chris brown and rihanna were both scheduled to perform at the grammys. before the awards show, chris brown turned himself into the police for reports of alleged assault, so he pulls out of the show. rihanna, for reasons unknown, also pulls out of the show. there is a lot of speculation as to whether rihanna is the victim of the alleged assault. regardless, instead of having their performances, the grammys threw together one of my dream-come-true performances.
let's stay together - jt and al green.
skip the first minute. jt is horrible when he isn't singing, acting, dancing, or doing anything that involves more than just plain talking. this is so great. back when it was first announced that al green was doing an album with ?uestlove, i read a story from mtv that said justin timberlake was in talks to guest on the album or at least had made it clear he wanted to guest. for some reason it never happened, which is i guess good because the album is incredible without him, but this performance is really good too. the one thing that really would've made it just stellar would've been john mayer on guitar rather than keith urban. cool dude, you're good at guitar but you are a country artist. john mayer transcends genre, and that's why he's great. but still this is an awesome performance.
super great performance number two: lost? - chris martin, jay-z.
chris martin is such a so-so performer to me, at least voice-wise. he can't really hit his falcetto notes. his bouncing around the stage is sort of weird too. but for some reason i still really like him. and going into viva la vida is awesome, what a grand song for a band to play. i absolutely love seeing drummer will champion banging away on that bell. and their background vocals are super great. so coldplay rocks.
great performance number three: b.b. king, buddy guy, keith urban, and john mayer in a tribute to bo diddley.
notice it's only great, not super great. it's a cool line-up of old/new musicians, but it's sort of a ho-hum performance with nothing really special to write home about. plus it's really short.
worst juxtaposition of artists performance: burnin' up/superstition - stevie wonder and the jonas brothers.
i'm sorry, did you just say the jonas brothers? yeah, so they might be the new face of pop music, but come on. these guys in no way have the chops to be put next to stevie wonder, living legend of r&b, soul, pop, jazz, funk, or whatever other genre you could attach to him. the man is an incredible artist, and he is stuck playing "burnin' up" alongside two crappy guitarists and some iffy vocalists. what happens to nick, who is supposed to be the good singer in the group, when he first starts his verse of superstition? and kevin and nick both playing guitar...it's a bummer to me that in our culture, showmanship is favored over actual talent. you might not be able to play your instrument very well, but if you are a natural born performer, than you will probably be famous. shame. and joe needs to stop trying to growl when he sings. it's not happening buddy.
hip-hop performance of the night: swagger like us - m.i.a., jay-z, kanye, t.i., lil wayne
this is ok. m.i.a. is incredibly fat. jay-z clearly has the most class of any of them. kanye, since when did mullets become fashionable again? t.i. kind of just sucks. and lil wayne, my goodness i do not understand what the appeal of this guy is. he won some grammys last night, thank goodness he didn't win the big one, album of the year. granted i haven't heard his universally-hailed album tha carter III, but what i have heard is just bad. awful beats, like painful to listen to. i do not get why he is so freakin' popular.
so those were the performances i saw. there was one little "bombshell" dropped by some presenters. blink-182 is reforming. an ellipse is really the only way i can communicate my emotion for news. blink sucks. they are basically responsible for making that crappy pop-punk garbage that infests the radio nowadays phenomenally popular. but i mean come on, who doesn't love a band who releases albums such as enema of the state and take off your pants and jacket? and honestly, who can forget their cameo (the mere fact that it's a cameo just makes me fandom soar) in the classic coming-of-age movie american pie? HORRIBLE. all the way around they are a terrible band who should not make any more music or try to be relevant at all. in any way.
ok as far the winners of the grammy awards go, i was generally fine with it, with a few exceptions.
1. jennifer hudson won for best r&b album. without a doubt, this should've gone to al green for lay it down, by far the BEST r&b, and nearly the best of any genre, album released in 2008.
2. raising sand and songs from it won record of the year, album of the year, and best pop collaboration with vocals, among other awards. now i get that this is a really good album. i've listened to it, and it was ok. i didn't fall in love with it. it's got a very distinct sound that i am surprised has garnered so much acclaim. but record AND album of the year? no way, especially when you look at both of those lists: coldplay, adele, radiohead. there was so much good music that probably should've won. and best pop collaboration with vocals should've absolutely gone to alicia keys and john mayer for lesson learned. i think i've written about this song before, how it is one of the most gorgeous pieces of music i've ever heard in my life. robert plant and alison krauss sound good together, but alicia and john KILLED it with that song. such a bummer. my biggest beef with raising sand winning so much, and are you ready for the bombshell here? IT WASN'T EVEN RELEASED IN 2008! it was released october 2007! and it won the grammy for best pop collaboration with vocals LAST YEAR! it's ridiculous. how is that even allowed? upsetting.
while i was displeased with those awards, i was EXTREMELY pleased when i found out daft punk had won for best dance recording AND best electronic/dance album, with around the world / harder, better, faster, stronger and alive 2007, respectively. SO deserving. that album is awesome.
so all in all, a pretty good show (i think, since i didn't really watch it). let's hope the oscars aren't any worse.
-jon
No comments:
Post a Comment